🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the federal government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the authorities covers the cost of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart animals – something Kristy Burgess discovered personally.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting temperaments.

“One whale selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her relationship with the whales progressed against a background of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with pieces in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and around the clock care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in early March following the passing of Eos, an sick beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility thought information of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs demands for the whales to be transferred right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a continued situation in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As authorities work to find a answer, proposals have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective location, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|